kadup

Make sure users trust it so much they can no longer discern hallucinations and lies from reality, then keep the AI training on content generated by itself.

Do you tend to write down a list of bullet points every time a loved one needs help?

And we would soon follow.

There’s a difference between “okay, Aedes and Anopheles do not belong here and can be exterminated from this local environment because we inadvertently introduced them here” versus “let’s just exterminate all mosquitos, you know, some of the most important biomass that feeds uncountable species in a deeply interconnected network of ecological interactions that directly affects us”

It’s a significantly better idea to come up with solutions to the actual diseases.

You could implant an ethics chip directly into the brain of a CEO and it wouldn’t help.

Capitalism is fundamentally broken, and what it takes to be successful in this system is directly opposed to the benefit of people or this planet.

Just like if you had cancer, the solution wouldn’t be to train an AI to prescribe better multi-vitamin pills. You need to treat the cancer.

deleted by creator

I mean… Do you support the recent proposal to ban online porn? How about alcohol?

Valve provides a game, an appropriate age rating, a description of the monetization scheme, and a way for users to freely trade items.

If minors transform that into a gambling addiction, it’s certainly a big problem, but I don’t see how that translates into “Steam bad, Epic Games good”

Counter Strike is a M rated game

Well this discussion has turned from “there’s no free emai!” to “I don’t recommend using free email from your university because I heard this caused trouble to somebody else once” which is not the point, so I’m not sure how I’m supposed to reply.

I can keep the basic “[email protected]” one, I can’t keep the optional department-specific ones like “[email protected]” if I quit my position or graduate.

What’s the last time you’ve bought a board game? A mix of the pandemic, more people in the hobby and a few big examples becoming so popular they defined the new norm on pricing, means $150 for a board game is extremely common. It’s not even the most expensive example.

Always has been

Not necessarily. My university provides a mail box for every student and their privacy policy is quite transparent and honest. The only limitations are related to the rate you can send emails, to prevent spam.

That’s the most specific and irrelevant example I’ve ever heard in my life lol

“This car is unusable and nobody will ever like it! Did you know that under the trunk, if you look at it with a UV light, the paint pattern is using a slightly different hue than the rest of the body?”

bottom text

AI is super expensive to run, yet these companies do EVERYTHING to make sure we are using it all the time - Microsoft is bundling it on every native app. They also openly admit they’re not able to make it profitable even when considering the people paying expensive subscriptions to use it.

So isn’t this contradiction suspicious? What’s really the reason behind making sure we will use AI even when we didn’t ask for it?

He’s advocating

Wow, such an incredible self sacrifice, such a profound movement. Shall I write him a thank you letter?

I can guarantee you that Pedro Pascal isn’t struggling, and I’d love it if we could “work together” as you said on actual art, not fast food style commercial mega-productions.

You’re correct about most trees not following your typical seasonal variance.

You’re incorrect about this meaning we don’t deal with significant amounts of leaves and flowers. Search for Handroanthus images, then imagine one on each sidewalk, and imagine all their flowers on the ground.

Oh thankfully you included the ® for every single mention of your game’s title. Otherwise I was totally going to steal it!

Somehow, I’m significantly more worried about a local theatre’s actors, or that girl who pays for college drawing people’s pets under commission, or that internet comic creator who lives with his parents… Rather than worrying about how the political climate will affect famous Hollywood personalities.