Finalnd is a NATO member. Russia ain’t fucking with NATO

Fair play to Microsoft here. Hopefully we see some pull requests from non-ms employees and a better wsl experience for us all

It is lemmy essentially. By far most communities, users, and a single point of failure in essence. That makes is quite good for getting it technically correct however, the best kind of correct

Reddit took many years to build that reputation. And earned creepy badges along the way. I’m not saying the fediverse doesn’t need to do it, but let’s not be in a rush. We have technical challenges, and a lemmy.world, and a .ml problem before we’re ready for the big leagues

And being niche is fine for now, email was tiny for decades

When the ends of our jeans looked all freyed and hemmed

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gears_of_War:_Ultimate_Edition

They have literally already done this job!

You mean with an unexplained orbit of Neptune? The reason we can’t find planet 9 may well be because it’s actually a black hole

As a manager, fuck Thursdays too

Thursday is bigger in Edinburgh too. Friday is a ghost town in many an office

You’ve never had to reason in a test? Problem solve in a test? Design in a test? Sure, some tests are memory tests, but plenty aren’t

Mini vivas for every assignment, yaldi!

Papers are being disrupted. Exams will become more relevant. Can’t use AI with only a pencil and paper

Yeah, my favourite ever laptop. Would love to see the netbook return. Cheap and cheerful. Chromebooks just not the same

A hike does suggest a bit more than nearby tbf

Look at Heathrow recently too. There’s one substation that will be both critical ane vulnerable also, dirt cheap to cause maximum effect

For the most part, I agree. But YouTube is full of gold too. Lots of amateurs making content for themselves. And plenty of newspapers are high quality and worth your time to understand the current environment in which we operate. Don’t let them be your only source of news though, social media and newspapers are both guilty of creating information bubbles. Expand, be open, don’t be tribal.

Don’t use AI. Do your own thinking

Given your prompts, maybe you are good at discerning flaws and analysing your own arguments too

Wikipedia isn’t to be referenced for scientific papers, I’m sure we all agree there. But it does do almost exactly what you described. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe has some great further reading links. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmology has some great reads too. And for the time short: https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmology which also has Related Pages

I’m still yet to see how AI beats a search engine. And your example hasn’t convinced me either

I’m still sceptical, any chance you could share some prompts which illustrate this concept?

You search for topics and keywords on search engines. It’s a different skill. And from what I see, yields better results. If something is vague also, think quickly first and make it less vague. That goes for life!

And a tool which regurgitates rubbish in a verbose manner isn’t a tool. It’s a toy. Toy’s can spark your curiosity, but you don’t rely on them. Toy’s look pretty, and can teach you things. The lesson is that they aren’t a replacement for anything but lorem ipsum