Another traveler of the wireways.

  • 115 Posts
  • 267 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023







  • Sort of odd to see this again (from Vox as well, I think?). It seems to add more detail, but the bottom line remains the same: it’s largely because fewer people are trying to immigrate into the U.S. since the Trump admin entered office.

    Trump might struggle to ramp up deportations along the border, as Obama did, simply because significantly fewer people are coming. In March, border apprehensions fell to 7,181, a 95 percent decrease from March 2024.

    This all sucks, and another part that sucks about it is that as usual, in the absence of as many of the Republicans’/conservatives’ favorite scapegoats, they begin turning inward and grabbing anyone and everyone that remotely resembles those scapegoats to abuse and deport to appeal to their base. Without more pushback, and as those deportation numbers continue to dwindle, you can expect that they’ll begin more widely rounding up their detractors (or at least attempting to).


  • Odd url…Here’s the original: https://futurism.com/chatgpt-polluted-ruined-ai-development

    Nice detail to use when searching the internet btw:

    “But if you’re collecting data before 2022 you’re fairly confident that it has minimal, if any, contamination from generative AI,” he added. “Everything before the date is ‘safe, fine, clean,’ everything after that is ‘dirty.’”

    Try running searches set pre-2022, at least for older info, to reduce the possibilities of AI generated noise.

    Anyway, kinda funny to see these generators may be producing enough noise to make producing more noise somewhat harder. Hopefully this doesn’t also impact more productive AI development, such as what’s used in scientific research and the like, as that would genuinely suck.

    Edit:
    Revised from generators “have produced” to “may be producing” to better reflect the lack of concrete info regarding generative AI data pollution as someone else pointed out. As they note:

    “Now, it’s not clear to what extent model collapse will be a problem, but if it is a problem, and we’ve contaminated this data environment, cleaning is going to be prohibitively expensive, probably impossible,” he told The Register.














  • Archive link: https://archive.ph/N8QBu

    Is there anything else you want people to know about Bluesky?

    This is a choose-your-own-adventure game. You can get in there and customize the experience as much as you want. If you’re not finding what you want within the Bluesky app, there might be another app within the protocol ecosystem that will give you what you want. If you can’t find it, you can build it. You don’t get this level of control anywhere else.

    Emphasis added on last sentence. If nothing else tells you an interview is as much marketing as it is aiming to be genuinely informative, it should be statements like this.

    That last sentence is basically a lie, as anyone across ActivityPub networks can tell you. I would say I don’t know why they would say this, but I do know at least one reason: marketing.

    It can be argued ActivityPub doesn’t enable the same level of control, but the problem is that it’s so damn flexible that it’d be somewhat disingenuous to do so.

    AuthTransfer has similar problems but of a different sort, primarily that too many people not using it don’t realize how it’s still rapidly changing and that already there are some independent and semi-independent platforms emerging built with it.

    What remains important to keep an eye out for is if/when the AuthTransfer protocol is fully released from Bluesky’s ownership/control and becomes an open standard. I think that’s as important or more important than any fully independent “instance”, to put it in ActivityPub terms, built with it.








  • Personally I dislike anything with -verse involved because big companies have run it into the ground and then some.

    The boring, dry ways of describing them work best in my opinion.

    Federated forums is the driest, most technical and to the point but not very telling.

    Swap out forum for link aggregator and you have similar, arguably even more technical (certainly more of a mouthful).

    Connected/linked forums might be more approachable, more readily conveying how these are separate forums but networked together.

    Cross-forums may work as well to the same end, but not sure how immediately understandable cross may be in this context and outside of gaming spaces.

    Whatever the case I kind of think this has things backwards. What’s more important than describing and talking about the backend tech is pointing people to any of the sites built with them that have anything of interest to them to bother with. I can’t think of anything online I’ve ever gone to or used because someone told me it was using Apache, Nginx, phpBB, or like an Open Source Web Server or using such and such CDN.

    The reason why is simple: next to nobody talks like that. The only people that might are deep in web dev.














OSZAR »