This comm is not the place to continue discussions from elsewhere or a drama haven.
Having had to lock posts because the conversation was going off the rails and getting very heated and political… that is the right call.
If the purpose of the community isn’t being served by the discussion, it should be shutdown, let people have their internet fights somewhere else.
Removed by mod
Nothing is stopping you from making the post to continue the argument elsewhere. Or making a community to have that argument.
If a gardener doesn’t want to have people fighting in their garden I see no problem with that.
Removed by mod
Exactly. That scenario is exactly why locking is possible. You lock the thread so people can’t keep derailing, and are forced to actually take it to the appropriate places instead.
OP is just butthurt because they couldn’t argue politics in an apolitical community anymore.
Even when the mod was involved in the political talk and didn’t get their shit removed?
This is clearly PTB material.
That’s off topic.
What’s the background conext?
Unless you provide more details it just looks like you’re trying to start needless drama.
The background context is here, in this comm.
Don’t bring the argument into the comments. That was the right call.
You deserved it! Way too much crying going on in comment sections lately.
Why do so many of you go to communities that you disagree with, start shit, get banned, then come here to continue the shit stirring in the comments?!
Guys if you don’t like a fucking community, just block it or avoid it. WTF?! lmao
Yeah, its pernicious. We have communities for focused discussions (at least in theory)… but some people treat ALL as a personal attack on their core beliefs and instead of blocking the community they don’t like… they start a crusade.
Yeeaahh… You’re going to need to post a little more context than that…
The context is here in this comm.
If you can’t even be arsed to explain your issue or at the very least provide a link to the context, I’m not going to go hunting for it.
YDI by default. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It’s not my issue. You’re not even paying attention enough to know who you’re replying to.
I think you should re-read my comment. “You” is both a specific and general pronoun.
It’s generally good to try and be charitable when interpreting what others have written.
This mod action wasn’t just intelligent, it was actually harm reduction.
It’s a known thing that folks with ADHD may engage in internet arguments for the dopamine. Divide by Zero has a number of neurologically atypical members, and while we’re a self-governing herd of cats (the majority of which seem to have level heads), we can’t always stop engaging in stupid, needless, dumbass arguments when we should. Especially when mixed with people of… differing ideology.
The comments section was allowed to mature enough that a majority of people weighed in on the original point of the post, the mod action, before it devolved into arguments about the content of the post being actioned. That’s the perfect age for locking the thread.
An analogy- the pirates were allowed to get into and distribute the rum. They were allowed to drink and sing. When they started fighting, that’s when the cat o’ nine came out. This is appropriate and about the only way to run a ship.
ETA: I hope you all know how fucking difficult it was for me to approve of someone in a position of authority in public like this. I’m real glad there’s zero ties to this account and anything to do with my real life because I have a fucking reputation, thankyouverymuch.
I’m trying hard to make it viable to be considered as not an authority :)
Db0 made the right call here, this isn’t the place for arguments and drama. YDI
No, they didn’t. DB0 should have just removed the comments that the mod was making that was stirring the pot.
This could have been handled in private. But instead, the community mod was involved the comments- arguing politics. They even admitted as much that they were off topic when I tried to stop it.
Go ahead and check to see if their comets were removed.
They weren’t.
Mine were.
Note how the mod stoked the fire, and the admin came in to lock it down.
Disagreed, locking is the correct call, people are going to just keep coming to continue the argument otherwise or rehash removed topics (you’re guilty of that one). @[email protected] probably should’ve banned some of those people but locking stops the arguments dead in their tracks, so is a valid solution to stop the arguments.
I guess the mod is exempt from it all though? Because they were there stirring the pot and didn’t get a single comment removed.
Bias is fine as it’s impossible to not be at times, but pretending to run a community as “anarchistic” while showing a clear bias and pretending to be neutral is bad faith in my book.
The irony is, the mod was in the comments arguing politics. My comments were removed, and theirs weren’t.
Even when I was the one trying to tell them that I wasn’t going to argue with them because they have removed my comments for being off topic in the past.
This is factually proven PTB.
deleted by creator
